Dáil Éireann Debate, Tuesday - 4 April 2017
235. Deputy David Cullinane asked the Minister for Education and Skills the reason for the internal review at Waterford Institute of Technology, as mentioned by officials from his Department at the Committee of Public Accounts on 23 March 2017; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16024/17]
Amharc ar fhreagra236. Deputy David Cullinane asked the Minister for Education and Skills the purpose of the internal review at Waterford Institute of Technology, as mentioned by officials from his Department at the Committee of Public Accounts on 23 March 2017; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16025/17]
Amharc ar fhreagra237. Deputy David Cullinane asked the Minister for Education and Skills when he expects to receive a copy of the internal review at Waterford Institute of Technology, as mentioned by officials from his Department at the Committee of Public Accounts on 23 March 2017; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16026/17]
Amharc ar fhreagra238. Deputy David Cullinane asked the Minister for Education and Skills the terms of reference of the internal review at Waterford Institute of Technology, as mentioned by officials from his Department at the Committee of Public Accounts on 23 March 2017; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16027/17]
Amharc ar fhreagra239. Deputy David Cullinane asked the Minister for Education and Skills the reason it is appropriate that the president of Waterford Institute of Technology does not have a role in the internal review at the institute, as mentioned by officials from his Department at the Committee of Public Accounts on 23 March 2017; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [16028/17]
Amharc ar fhreagraI propose to take Questions Nos. 235 to 239, inclusive, together.
My officials expect to receive a copy of the report on the review being carried out by Waterford Institute of Technology this week.
The President delegated his function in the review to avoid any possible conflict of interest.
The purpose and reason for the review is to confirm that WIT’s interests had been appropriately represented and protected, all relevant policies, protocols and procedures had been complied with and satisfactory governance processes had been applied in the case concerned.
