Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Thursday, 26 Nov 2020

Written Answers Nos. 136-153

Banking Sector

Ceisteanna (136)

Ged Nash

Ceist:

136. Deputy Ged Nash asked the Minister for Finance if there is anything cited in the relationship framework agreement between the Minister and a bank (details supplied) that prohibits or in any way prevents him from meeting with the bank to discuss and negotiate on a change to that agreement; if he plans to do so given the unprecedented context of Covid-19 and the difficulties for personal and business customers; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [39155/20]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As the Deputy is aware, as Minister for Finance I have no role in the commercial decisions made by the banks, including the structure and level of pricing for their various product offerings for both personal and business customers. This applies equally to the banks in which the State has a shareholding.

Decisions in this regard are the sole responsibility of the board and management of the banks which must be run on an independent and commercial basis. The independence of banks in which the State has a shareholding is protected by Relationship Frameworks which are legally binding documents that cannot be changed unilaterally.

The Deputy will be further aware that as set out in the Relationship Framework for AIB, due to its systemic importance to the Irish financial system, the bank received significant support from the State in the financial crisis.

This support led to the State becoming the majority shareholder in AIB with the approval of the European Commission. This approval was subject to the Minister and the Bank entering into the Relationship Framework on terms agreed by the European Commission. One of the reasons for this was to ensure that the Minister’s shareholding did not result in breaches of competition law rules.

Critically, and as set out in the Relationship Framework, any amendments to, or revocation or replacement of, the Relationship Framework must be made following consultation with AIB and upon the instruction, or with the agreement, of the European Commission.

As is clearly set out in the Relationship Framework, the board of AIB has full responsibility and authority for all of the operations of the bank in accordance with its legal, fiduciary, and regulatory obligations. The Relationship Framework further provides for safeguards as to the separate management of each of the State’s interests in Irish credit institutions (including in the Bank) in order to ensure that those interests, and the management of those interests, do not lead to a prevention, restriction or distortion of competition in contravention of merger control or competition law rules.

It is therefore the case that any proposed amendment to the Relationship Framework must not only be in accordance with the regulatory requirements under which AIB operates, the State Agreements more particularly set out in the Relationship Framework, and the law, the proposed amendments must also be approved by the European Commission following consultation with AIB.

Question No. 137 answered with Question No. 83.
Question No. 138 answered with Question No. 108.

Mortgage Interest Rates

Ceisteanna (139)

Paul McAuliffe

Ceist:

139. Deputy Paul McAuliffe asked the Minister for Finance the steps he is taking to reduce mortgage interest rates; his views on whether interest rates being charged here are reasonable compared to the rest of Europe; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [39118/20]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am aware that the general level of lending interest rates in Ireland are higher than is the case in many other European countries, though it should also be noted that recent trends indicate that rates have been falling.

For example, interest rates on new fixed rate mortgages (excluding renegotiations) have fallen from 4.11% in December 2014 to 2.64% in September of this year.

However, Irish loans, particularly Irish mortgages, can have different characteristics from those offered by other EU banks making direct comparison of these rates inconsistent. For example, many Irish banks include incentives such as cash back offers, which reduce the effective Irish mortgage interest rate. Irish mortgages are also not subject to upfront fees typically charged by banks in other EU jurisdictions, and which can result in lower EU headline rates.

Nevertheless, there are a number of important factors determine the interest rates charged on Irish mortgages. These include operational costs, certain structural factors as referenced above (such as incentives offered), as well as the fact that pricing will reflect:

- credit risk and capital requirements which in Ireland are elevated due to historical loss experience;

- the level of non-performing loans which is higher in Ireland relative to other European banks (as provisioning and capital requirements are higher for these loans to reflect their higher risk and this in turn results in higher credit and capital costs for the Irish banks);

- there are lower levels of competition in the Irish banking market compared to other jurisdictions (however, it is noted that a new entrant has recently entered the residential mortgage market and that it is offering fixed rate mortgages at competitive interest rates).

The Central Bank has a range of measures to protect consumers who are taking out a mortgage. The consumer protection framework requires lenders to be transparent and fair in all their dealings with borrowers and that borrowers are protected from the beginning to the end of the mortgage life cycle; through protections at the initial marketing/advertising stage, in assessing the affordability and suitability of the mortgage and at a time when borrowers may find themselves in financial difficulties. In particular, the Central Bank introduced of a number of increased protections for variable rate mortgage holders which came into effect in February 2017. The enhanced measures, which are provided for in an Addendum to the Consumer Protection Code 2012, require lenders to explain to borrowers how their variable interest rates have been set, including in the event of an increase. The measures also improve the level of information required to be provided to borrowers on variable rates about other mortgage products their lender provides which could provide savings for the borrower and signpost the borrower to the CCPC’s mortgage switching tool.

The Central Bank also introduced additional changes to the Consumer Protection Code in January 2019 to help consumers make savings on their mortgage repayments, provide additional protections to consumers who are eligible to switch, and facilitate mortgage switching through enhancing the transparency of the mortgage framework.

Ultimately, however, the price lenders charge for their loans is a commercial matter for individual lenders. Nevertheless, I will continue to work with the Central Bank and also engage with lenders to encourage, within a framework which seeks to maintain overall financial stability, greater price and other competition in the mortgage market, both for new and existing borrowers. It is, therefore, a welcome development that a new residential mortgage lender has recently entered the market and it will be of benefit to new mortgage borrowers and also to borrowers, in particular to borrowers who may still on a standard variable rate with the lender, who may wish to consider switching to a new lender.

Question No. 140 answered with Question No. 86.
Question No. 141 answered with Question No. 120.

Banking Sector

Ceisteanna (142)

Ged Nash

Ceist:

142. Deputy Ged Nash asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 267 of 17 November 2020, the basis of the claim that the framework cannot be changed by him unilaterally, given the documents cited as the legal basis for the relationship framework (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [39154/20]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As the Deputy is aware and as set out in the Relationship Framework for AIB, due to its systemic importance to the Irish financial system, the bank received significant support from the State in the financial crisis.

This support led to the State becoming the majority shareholder in AIB with the approval of the European Commission. This approval was subject to the Minister and the Bank entering into the Relationship Framework on terms approved by the European Commission. One of the reasons for this was to ensure that the Minister’s shareholding did not result in breaches of competition law rules.

Critically, and as set out in the Relationship Framework, any amendments to, or revocation or replacement of, the Relationship Framework must be made following consultation with AIB and upon the instruction, or with the agreement, of the European Commission.

As is clearly set out in the Relationship Framework, the board of AIB has full responsibility and authority for all of the operations of the bank in accordance with its legal, fiduciary, and regulatory obligations. The Relationship Framework further provides for safeguards as to the separate management of each of the State’s interests in Irish credit institutions (including in the Bank) in order to ensure that those interests, and the management of those interests, do not lead to a prevention, restriction or distortion of competition in contravention of merger control or competition law rules.

It is therefore the case that any proposed amendment to the Relationship Framework must not only be in accordance with the regulatory requirements under which AIB operates, the State Agreements more particularly set out in the Relationship Framework, and the law, the proposed amendments must also be approved by the European Commission following consultation with AIB.

Disabled Drivers and Passengers Scheme

Ceisteanna (143)

James O'Connor

Ceist:

143. Deputy James O'Connor asked the Minister for Finance the number of persons currently availing of the disabled drivers and passengers scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [39194/20]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Disabled Driver and Disabled Passengers (Tax Concessions) Scheme provides for relief on VAT and VRT, based on how much the car has been adapted and whether the beneficiary is a driver or passenger, up to a maximum of

- Disabled drivers: €10,000

- Disabled passengers: €16,000

- Specifically adapted vehicles for drivers with severe disabilities: €16,000 (Specifically adapted vehicles are vehicles that need significant adaptations)

- Extensively adapted vehicles for drivers and passengers: €22,000 (Extensively adapted vehicles are vehicles that need adaptations that cost more than the open market selling price of the vehicle being adapted)

Under the rules of the Scheme a claim for VRT and VAT relief on an adapted car may be made every 2, 3 or 6 years, depending on the extent to which the car has been adapted. As such the Scheme data captures the volume of claims in a given period rather than the number of persons who may be eligible to make a claim.

In 2019, the Scheme supported the purchase of 6,374 vehicles, while the related Fuel Grant Scheme made over 12,000 payments in 2019. In the year to date, the Scheme has supported the purchase of 4,348 vehicles, with over 10,000 fuel grant payments made.

The cost of the Scheme in the year to date is approximately €44 million in terms of VRT and VAT foregone and over €8.5 million in terms of the fuel grant. The cost of the Scheme in 2019 was €72 million, comprising of VRT and VAT foregone as well as the fuel grant.

Banking Sector

Ceisteanna (144)

Brendan Smith

Ceist:

144. Deputy Brendan Smith asked the Minister for Finance the outcome of his discussions with a bank (details supplied) in relation to the need to retain a bank, its network of branches and the protection of employment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [39166/20]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

On the 21 October I met with representatives of Ulster Bank. I outlined that I expected that staff, customers and other stakeholders would be informed promptly about any decisions being made. In particular, I asked that staff representatives will be consulted and kept informed of developments. I also emphasised the importance of Ulster Bank to the Irish financial services market, to the wider economy and to the communities it serves.

Ulster Bank confirmed that the strategic review is ongoing and that no decision has yet been taken. Ulster Bank also confirmed that there is no set timetable for this review and that it is fully aware of the strategically important role that Ulster Bank plays in the provision of financial services to the Irish market.

While I will have further engagement with the bank as the review process continues, I would like to emphasise that I have no role in the review or any commercial decisions arising from it.

Question No. 145 answered with Question No. 84.
Question No. 146 answered with Question No. 80.

Brexit Supports

Ceisteanna (147)

Neale Richmond

Ceist:

147. Deputy Neale Richmond asked the Minister for Finance the steps his Department and the Revenue Commissioners have taken to support businesses through Brexit; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [38072/20]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

My Department is participating in whole of Government preparations for the end of the transition period, including in the area of business supports. This includes the measures brought forward through Budget 2021, which is based on a no deal Brexit scenario. In particular, I’d like to highlight the Brexit Loan Scheme and Future Growth Loan Scheme offered by the Strategic Banking Corporation of Ireland in conjunction with the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment and the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine. The SBCI also offers a Credit Guarantee Scheme to firms who may need it in order to secure a Comprehensive Guarantee for transit purposes. My Department is also collaborating with the Central Bank of Ireland and the NTMA to monitor and support readiness preparations in the financial services sector.

In addition, I am advised by Revenue that it has engaged extensively with businesses since 2018 to provide information and guidance on the impacts that Brexit could have and how to mitigate the risks. In September this year, Revenue wrote to approx. 90,000 businesses who traded with the UK during 2019 or in the first half of 2020. These are businesses who if they want to continue such trade, either by way of imports or exports or both, with the UK, excluding Northern Ireland, after 1 January, will need to take action to ensure their Brexit readiness. The letter included a Brexit readiness checklist and outlined a range of steps to be taken to get Brexit ready. As part of this intensified engagement, Revenue also targeted some 14,500 businesses (of the 90,000) for follow up telephone contact. The businesses contacted were identified as the most likely to be significantly impacted by Brexit.

Revenue live-streamed a two-day series of Brexit information sessions for business on 5 and 6 October 2020. These sessions provided important information on topics such as Customs, VAT, Excise and VRT, to help businesses to get ready for trading with or through Great Britain from 1 January 2021. Recordings of these sessions can be viewed on the Revenue website at www.revenue.ie/brexit.

Additionally, Revenue has participated in Brexit related events hosted by other Government Departments and in business and trade representative group events. The purpose of these events is to engage directly with traders, addressing their concerns, outlining the key steps they need to take to ensure that goods can move as efficiently as possible post-Brexit, and advising them of the requirements for simplified Customs procedures. I understand that Revenue is continuing its programme of stakeholder (trade and representative body) engagement including, in particular, engagement with IBEC, the haulage and logistics sector and ferry operators.

The Revenue website continues to be updated with specific information that outlines the obligations on businesses throughout the supply chain and offers them guidance on steps to take to meet the post-Brexit requirements.

As a result of Revenue’s engagement activity there has been a noticeable increase in registrations for a Customs Economic Operators Registration Identification (EORI) number. There were 32,000 EORI registrations in total since 2019. To assist businesses to register for an EORI number Revenue provided a helpful step by step guidance video for businesses on its website.

I am satisfied that Revenue and the Department have made very significant efforts to get businesses to engage with the challenge of Brexit. I strongly urge all businesses that will be impacted by Brexit to use the short time available between now and 1 January 2021 to put in place the necessary arrangements that will enable them to be able to undertake trade with and through the UK, excluding Northern Ireland, from that date.

Question No. 148 answered with Question No. 116.

Banking Sector Data

Ceisteanna (149)

Denis Naughten

Ceist:

149. Deputy Denis Naughten asked the Minister for Finance if State-owned banks are investing in or lending to companies directly involved in fossil fuel extraction; if so, the extent of such commercial activities; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [38842/20]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Officials in my Department requested a comment from the relevant banks in relation to the Deputy’s question and received the following responses in this regard:

AIB:

“As part of AIB’s sustainability agenda, the bank does not provide term finance or advisory services to entities involved in the extraction of oil and coal, onshore and offshore exploration and natural gas fracking. Furthermore the bank does not have material exposures to these activities.

AIB’s full Sustainability Exclusion List is published on its website

https://aib.ie/corporate/sector-expertise/excluded-activities"

PTSB:

“Permanent TSB does not invest in or lend to companies directly involved in fossil fuel extraction.”

Question No. 150 answered with Question No. 86.
Question No. 151 answered with Question No. 72.
Question No. 152 answered with Question No. 86.

Tax Code

Ceisteanna (153)

Richard Bruton

Ceist:

153. Deputy Richard Bruton asked the Minister for Finance his plans to refresh the roadmap for tax policy in relation to the taxation of companies; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36170/20]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I announced in Budget 2021 my intention to publish an update on Ireland’s Corporation Tax Roadmap. The Roadmap, first published in September 2018, marked the progress made to that date in the ongoing process of international corporate tax reform and set out 11 further commitments to action in the areas of tax reform, information exchange and dispute resolution. Two years on from this publication, it is now appropriate to take stock of progress made in achieving these commitments.

The 2018 Roadmap and the forthcoming Update are important elements of Ireland’s steady and consultative approach to managing change. The Update, which will be published in the near future, will signal a number of areas for consideration, consultation and action over the coming months and years, taking account of international developments.

Barr
Roinn